|
The
Controversy
| In the
opening narration of the film, Lansquenet is described as “a
quit little village in the French countryside whose people believed
in tranquility”. In a town thirsting for change from a lack
of individuality and abundance in conformity and compliance, the newest
citizen helps the town find its quencher in chocolate. Vianne and
her illegitimate daughter first experience oppression from the town
even before she opens her chocolaterie. The Catholic resident’s
entrance into Lent has almost begun, and the people are astonished
to learn of the shop’s opening during the fetal days of this
time of deprivation. This forty day long time period represents the
days Jesus spent withdrawing into the wilderness and fasting (Steinmetz
1). Not only does the store's opening provide the town with greater
temptation, but also abominates their religious beliefs. The narrator
explains the town’s convention in her opening lines, “If
you lived in this village, you understood what was expected of you.
You knew your place in the scheme of things. And if you happened to
forget, someone would help remind you”. The narrator fails to
mention that that someone was the town’s leader, the mayor.
Leading the town’s mind is Reynaud, the mayor whose beliefs
and cause are rigid in the teachings of his vague misinterpretation
of the Bible. The mayor is the closest existence of an antagonist
this movie has, yet he is still shown in the light of God and the
likings of Vianne. The two main ingredients of this placid town’s
rumpus include him and chocolate. Fighting for the abolishment of
chocolate in a time of sacrifice, Reynaud goes to great extremes for
the disposal of Vianne’s shop and lifestyle. Gaining the allegiance
of the rest of the town, he works for the eradication of the devil’s
food and its cook, but not without resistance. In Abby Carr's article
"Does Saying No to Chocolate Glorify God?" she describes
the attitude Catholics have toward fasting and Lenten devotion. "Yet,
it seems we’ve lost something in our automatic response to Lenten
devotion. We fall into old patterns too easily and the sacrifice we
make is often more empty than we would like. Why? Because we don’t
link what we sacrifice to what is actually separating us from God."
(Carr 1). In the movie Reynaud convinces the rookie priest to preach
to the town of the new presence of Satan in the community. The priest
conveys Reynaud's idea that the sweet indulgence only builds a gap
between the town and God but never gives the link between chocolate
and its relationship with reconciliation. Reynaud may have the town
behind him, but Vianne believes in her chocolate and shop just as
strongly as Reynaud buckles to his Bible. Although Vianne is alone
in her beliefs through her early days in the village, she befriends
an abused house wife who later takes refuge in Vianne’s home,
the chocolaterie. With this new friend comes new altercations whose
roots are stemmed from the forever contentious sweet we’ve come
to know. Her new friend leaves her husband to start a new life in
assistance with chocolate creation but not without input from the
mayor. Furious with her decision to leave him and ignore their vows,
Josephine’s husband confides in the mayor seeking a right for
the wrong that has been done unto him. Even more infuriating than
Josephine’s decision to leave him is her acceptance of the new
stranger to the town and their building friendship, but in a film
surrounded by food, the chocolate takes the cake for his main cause
of fury. Not only has he been humiliated in front of the town when
his wife leaves him, but she is now associated with the town’s
sweetest villain. Josephine’s character development can also
be linked to religion since the time of Lent is not also a time of
sacrifice and depravation but also a time of soul searching and self
development (Steinmetz 1). With Catholicism and chocolate in juxtaposition
with one another, the movie’s overlapping theme of religious
rebellion is exposed as chocolate becomes the reason for the season.
. Usually associated with giving up things for penance, Lent in the
small town becomes more of a struggle between enduring through temptation
and bringing down the enemy (Steinmetz 1). Not having a belief in
the Catholic faith, Vianne is viewed by the town as a protocol of
deception and the archetypal figure of temptation. With this force
of oppression against her, Vianne still stands by her affirmation,
if God made it so good, why is it so bad? |
|

|